The Meaning of Fahrenheit 451 :: Fahrenheit 451 Essays

The Meaning of Fahrenheit 451 This book depicts a story about a futuristic world in the middle of a nuclear war. The political sympathies of this future forbids its people from reading or taking a part in individual thinking. During this time, the law against reading is new and the government is taken on a task of destroying all of the books. This is where we meet or main character named Guy Montag. He is a fireman. Him and his crew go around and burn books in libraries, and homes. I think the theme of the story is that there are many facets to a personality than is first visible. The book is narrated in troika person. At the beginning of the book we see Guy Montag as a ruthless man who enjoys his job very much. Later on he discovers that he does not enjoy his life, it is merely a fake mask. He slowly discovers this in himself when he meets a teenage girl named Clarisse who is his new neighbor. She awakens a hunch forward and desire in Montag to enjoy the simple things in lif e. He also discovers that his happiness is fake when he discovers that he does not love his tranquilizer accustomed wife who cares more about her television relatives than real life. Guy Montag slowly becomes unhappy with his life when he learns of Clarisses death in an automobile accident and when he had to bun an old lady alive in her house because she refused to let them burn her books. When we discover that Guy Montag is unhappy with his life, we start to respect that he is nerve-wracking to change his way of life. When Montag goes to talk to his wife about the disadvantages about being a fireman, she offers no sympathy and tells him to stay away from her because all she knows is that books are unlawful. afterwards awhile, Captain Beatty has a talk with Montag because he is suspicious of Montags behavior. He tells Montag that the ideas in books are not real and they cause a dispute in peoples minds. He says that ridding the world of controversy puts an end to dispute and al lows people to live happy. Later on, Montag confesses that he had not just stolen one book but yet a small library.

Gender Roles in Angela Carters The Company of Wolves Essay -- Carter

Gender Roles in Angela Carters The Company of WolvesIn her transformation of the well-known fable Little Red locomote Hood, Angela Carter plays upon the readers familiarity. By echoing elements of the allegory intended to scare and thus caution young girls, she evokes preconceptions and stereotypes about gender roles. In the tralatitious tale, Red sticks to the path, but needs to be rescued from the threatening wolf by a hunter or woodsman. Carter retells the story with a modern office on women. By using fantasy metaphorically and hyperbolically, she can poignantly convey her unorthodox and underlying messages. Before telling the story of Red Riding Hood, Carter establishes the nature of wolves in a folk-lore or legend style, which appears to be at least partially factual. The narrator describes wolves as malicious hunters in an ominous relish The wolf is carnivore incarnate and hes as cunning as he is ferocious once hes had a taste of flesh, then nothing else will do (Norton An thology of publications by Women, 2232). She tells of their desperation for food, one possible explanation for their eagerness to devour humans, but warns that the danger of falling prey to a wolf is ever-present. Beneath her descriptive background information of wolves lies Carters real message men are sexual predators, and hunt for flesh like wolves do. This subtle and foreshadowed element becomes slightly more indubitable as the focus changes from wolves of the forest, to the mythical creatures of werewolves. The narrator alludes to three plausible legends involving the hunter, the witch, and the bride, who all encountered men who transformed into wolves. She references possible explanations for this phenomenon, citing the Devil tra... ...al roles and become the sexual aggressor to be the victor instead of the victim. Carters twist on a well-known tale likely surprises many readers. Thus she is likely suggesting we should rethink our expectations of gender roles. Another mode of presenting alternate gender roles would be making Red a boy, and having him saved by a girl at the end, but this scenario would not be as striking and therefore effective. Furthermore, Reds sexual awakening and consequent taming of the wolf serves as encouragement for women not to be passive, but to assert themselves in all situations, specially sex, which is one area that has long been characterized by rigid/traditional expectations of gender roles.Works CitedCarter, Angela. The Company of Wolves. Folk and Fairy Tales. Eds. Martin Hallett and Barbara Karasek. 3rd Edition. Toronto Broadview Press, 2002.

Terrorism - A Peaceful Jihad is an Oxymoron :: Exploratory Essays Research Papers

Terrorism - A Peaceful jehad is an OxymoronIn June of 2002, when asked to give a starting time speech at Harvard, Zayed Yasin, a Muslim, wrote a speech in which he explained his definition of a Jihad. In accordance with the subject matter, Yasin titled his speech My Ameri stinkpot Jihad. When Harvard requested him to change the title, he complied. This action, though, stirred up many who believed Yasin had a right to use his original title. From the stance John Milton takes in his essay, Aeropagitica, one can clearly see that he would argue against Harvards decision to censor the title of Yasins speech. Milton, however, overzealously defends free speech and fails to recognize that the authorities must fulfil some things from people under their governing authority. Though Yasin appears to attempt to portray a different perspective of the word Jihad in his speech than that aspect that has dominated America over the past year, he fails to recognize its more common meaning. Rather, h e excuses the common meaning as having been corrupted and misinterpreted. In his speech, Yasin explains that to him, Jihad is the de considerationination to do right, to do justice even against your own interests. It is an individual struggle for personal moral behavior. Yasin continues to explain his definition of Jihad and gives more dilate about it. According to author Abdullah Al Araby, although Yasin correctly describes Jihad as a personal, inner struggle, Jihad also means, fighting in the name of Allah. Al Araby explains, In this sense Jihad is the struggle for the cause of spreading Islam, using all means available to Muslims, including force. This kind of Jihad is often referred to as saintly War. As a result of the recent September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, people refer to this definition when discussing the term Jihad. Contrary to popular belief, Islam does not teach peace to the extent most Americans think it does. The Quran, the holy book o f Islam, commands, Fight (kill) them (non-Muslims), and Allah will punish (torment) them by your hands, see to it them with shame (Surah 914). Numerous similar commands exist in the Quran (Al Araby). Not only does Yasin present a misleading and deceptive argument by explaining hardly half of the meaning of the term Jihad, but he also, by using the term in conjunction with the adjective American, implies that Americans participate in Jihad.